| Calendar | Add A Class | College Degrees | Online Classes | DVDs & CDs | On-site Classes | Advertising | Contact Us |
 

 

 

 

Sign up for FREE
training articles &
class updates
Your Email:

 

 

cleardot.gif (807 bytes)

 

cleardot.gif (807 bytes)

line-small.gif (227 bytes)     July 2008

Important: To ensure future delivery of the Policetraining.net newsletter to your inbox (not bulk or junk folders) please add our "From" address info@policetraining.net to your address book or e-mail whitelist.

line-small.gif (227 bytes)

- Sponsored By -
 

 

Target rich environments

By Rick Armellino
Baker Ballistics, LLC

The nightmare scenario

Does the existence of “gun-free school zones” make anyone safer against armed intruders while at school?

A wounded survivor vividly describes the speed and brutality displayed by an armed school invader inside a crowded classroom on Virginia Tech’s state mandated gun-free campus; “he walked through the door, real fast, didn’t say anything, all he did was bang, bang, bang, bang …..“  Following the nine minute massacre, thirty-one innocent students and the one heroic professor were dead, and an additional twenty-eight students were injured, many seriously.  America’s gun-free zones stand as a monument to modern society’s worship of good intentions, versus the cold reality that evil exists, even at schools.

There is a common thread that links most, if not all recent mass murders and suicides at schools – the killers’ use of psychotropic mind-altering medications for common disorders such as shyness, hyper-activity and anxiety.  Many of the current generation of young adults attending college has been educated in an institutionalized public school environment, criticized by some for advocating the use of psychotropic medications to assist an alarming number of children advance through the grades.

Complicating the public safety aspect of this issue are medical privacy laws, such as The Family Education Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, commonly known as FERPA.  Authorities are required to protect the privacy of existing records, even those belonging to students that show a propensity towards violence or other anti-social indicators.

As expected, following the Virginia Tech massacre, the elected state officials of the Commonwealth of Virginia, with the blessing of their Governor, refused to rescind all gun-free zones at state institutions.

Political correctness - It’s a people control issue

The true origins of political correctness can be traced back to the mid-1800 and the socialist political ambitions of Karl Marx.  Followers of this movement learned that it was possible to politically change society using the technique of framing the discussion to limit the free exchange of all ideas.   By being intolerant of suggestions that were clearly contrary to their “enlightened” political beliefs and goals, people with opposing views were quickly silenced and categorized as outside the “opinion” of the collective group.  The outsiders, unwilling to change their views were labeled the “politically incorrect”, and unworthy of belonging to the more progressive group.

It is no secret that a significant number of leaders in charge of public safety at America's institutions of higher education are totally intolerant of weapons.  It is politically correct on many campuses to oppose weapons for any purpose, including those intended for use to save the lives of their contained population when attacked.  Hence, the gun-free school zone, and worse yet, unarmed campus police.

Guns - When more is better

Gun-control is a good example of politics in its purest form – duly elected public officials determining what’s in the best interests of the publics’ safety.  Anti-gun laws that prevent law abiding adult citizens from exercising their right of self-protection are totally illogical, since it is well established that criminals don’t tend to follow the law. 

Whatever the actual reasons for the widespread fear of weapons in the hands of law-abiding citizens, the reality is that we all live in a free country that contains an estimated 200 to 240 million firearms.  Firearms will remain abundant regardless of laws intended to restrict their availability and use.  Until our society is completely civilized, elected leaders should encourage the legal possession and usage of weapons, and swiftly and severely punish criminal predators that violently prey upon the innocent.

Anyone who honestly believes that establishing gun-free zones will increase personal safety is very naïve.  Vladimir Lenin, the first premier of the Soviet Union observed; “A lie told often enough becomes the truth”.  The popular belief that "guns kill", and therefore must banned for our collective safety, is pure political nonsense.  The well documented research of Dr. John Lott in his book titled More Guns, Less Crime, scientifically disproves many of the emotional based myths that cloud this contentious subject.

Author and Nobel Laureate prize winner Milton Friedman states, “John Lott documents how far 'politically correct' vested interests are willing to go to denigrate anyone who dares disagree with them. Lott has done us all a service by his thorough, thoughtful, scholarly approach to a highly controversial issue."

Lott’s unbiased studies indicate that violent crime rates increase when law-abiding citizens are denied the right to carry concealed weapons and conversely, crime rates drop when criminals fear deadly resistance from armed citizens.  Television journalist John Stossel also agrees with Lott’s findings and has produced an excellent television essay on the subject of armed, versus unarmed, citizenry.

Those who advocate “gun-free zones” should realize that banning weapons may actually attract the homicidal and suicidal killer – as evidenced by the armed predators’ choice of crowded locations such as Norris Hall and the Amish schoolhouse.  Government mandated gun-free “soft” targets assure a high casualty count is achieved before the effective mobilization and arrival of armed rescuers.

Feel good fixes

Following the recent rash of school massacres, many institutions of higher education have spent millions of dollars promoting public safety with door-locks, surveillance cameras, exterior lighting, mass text-messaging systems, warning sirens, magnetic card access, and other passive response methods designed to increase public safety.  Unfortunately, hope should never be a strategy, but that’s exactly what the well-lit and camera plentiful gun-free school zone promotes; politically correct good intentions – offering little more than “hope” that a massacre won’t happen here.

Students cowering under their desks during an active massacre do not realize any gains from the security investments many colleges are currently spending on their behalf.  These reactive security methods, although well-intentioned, are virtually useless in preventing an armed invader from conducting mass murder.  The widespread adoption of "feel good" passive security products and mass notification systems has been born from the same failed philosophies as the gun-free school zone.

The mathematics of massacre

The longer the wait for an armed response, the higher the casualty counts.  The historical average is one death every 15 seconds.  Law enforcement must be candidly honest in their assessment of response time based upon the environment, personnel deployment, training, equipment and aggressiveness of the average officer.  This math is very simple – an average of eight casualties per minute (4 deaths plus 4 wounded) is likely to occur as trapped victims wait for armed rescuers.

When deranged killers decide to memorialize their fifteen minutes of fame before checking out of this world by first murdering scores of innocent victims – there is only one sure way to stop them, and it depends upon the fast availability of a weapon and someone who is willing to use it.

The best first responder to a massacre is obviously the closest armed and capable rescuer to be located in close proximity to the kill zone.  Having an armed law enforcement officer close by would be pure luck.

Armed and equipped officers, authorized and well-practiced in Immediate Action Rapid Deployment (IARD) tactics and able to respond quickly to the kill zone, are only available at a handful of institutions.  Even a solo officer conducting high-speed IARD tactics needs adequate time to safely arrive at the killing zone.  Time waits for no one.

Home of the brave

The State of Utah has initiated a politically brave and proactive step by banning all “gun-free school zones”, and other states will hopefully follow their lead.  Clear-thinking lawmakers have totally eliminated all “feel good” gun-free zones, recognizing that their demise is the first step necessary to effectively protect the innocent. 

The next step is encouraging the appropriate leaders to work together to organize an aggressive plan that realistically protects school populations from armed and potentially murderous invaders.

Very political, bureaucratic and compartmentalized institutional relationships exist between many college administrators and the first responding police management.  Getting past any emotional and territorial barriers to better protect students is in everyone’s best interests.

Proactively protecting lives – Politically incorrect, but possible

Allowing pre-qualified adult students and staff to be armed and formally trained would be the fastest method of armed response into the kill zone of an active massacre.  The mere suggestion of this option at a college will likely be emotional, contentious and dismissed as not acceptable by education leaders.

Law enforcement members may also balk at the idea of armed citizens on campus.  First responders do not wish to encounter weapon-toting “good guys” as they approach armed and hostile invaders.  Effectively separating “fish from fowl” is much too difficult and time-consuming.  Or is it?

A dedicated group of armed citizens who work at, or attend school can be formed.  Envision a program that accepts, at police discretion, select individuals willing to be psychologically evaluated, trained and periodically instructed by police to become active members of the “team”.

Law enforcement and emergency public employees are already legally indemnified against personal liability while following established policy - these armed volunteers would also need to be officially recognized and legally protected while conducting their authorized weapon carrying classroom defense duties.

IARD tactics can be incorporated, as necessary, to utilize trained armed citizens as the first possible layer of response to an active shooter.  These volunteers can use their specialized training and observational skills at the earliest and most critical stages of a planned massacre.  Properly managed, and clearly identified, they will not be a threat to arriving law enforcement responders.

How shall law enforcement officers separate “fish from fowl”?  Simple – some form of unique identification must be clearly displayed on the armed volunteers – such as an orange hat or a large brightly colored front and back torso “bib” to be quickly donned.  The military utilizes various identification methods during the heat of battle, referencing this concept IFF (Identification Friend Foe), and variations of this can be explored.  Students and staff can be thoroughly instructed in proper use of deadly force, including explicit procedures to be used to assure they personally do not become the target of arriving police responders.

Leadership – Combining resources for the common good

The most important, and vital, phase of this process is the establishment of a working relationship between police first responders, adult armed students, and university leadership.

Not too many years ago law enforcement actively sought and was offered help from the general public in the performance of many dangerous duties – citizens were routinely “deputized” during extraordinary circumstances.

Armed campus civilians would be a tremendous asset during an active massacre, and an excellent deterrent to eliminate the soft target attraction of a crowded and contained gun-free environment.

It is important that leaders take a fresh look at this issue – the unpredictable and unpreventable nature of homicidal and suicidal predators attacking schools is too great to ignore.  Logic must overcome emotion so realistic options can be discussed and implemented rationally, without the hindrance of political correctness.

line-small.gif (227 bytes)
 

2008 Update to 'The Five Phases of the Active Shooter'
By Lt. Dan Marcou

Written For and Distributed by Public Agency Training Council.

Once Upon a Time in America:

Picture yourself attending a lecture in an auditorium of a local College, where you are taking classes to complete your master’s degree. You are an off duty police officer seated in the audience listening to a presentation on community policing by a highly esteemed professor, when suddenly a heavily armed man dressed in black bursts through the door of the auditorium and opens fire with a Remington model 870 12 gauge shotgun.

The auditorium transforms from the picture of decorum to bloody chaos immediately due to this ultimate act of terrorism. The killing is not for a country, it is not for a cause, it is not for Allah, nor even on behalf of a domestic radical group. The killing is for one thing and one thing only, “achieving a top score.”

You are already on the move, before the killer has fired his first shot. The shooter is oblivious to your presence, because he has an entire auditorium full of victims that he has turned into a swirling twirling mass of confusion and he is experiencing tunnel vision. He is in the midst of his twisted ecstasy.

You are on the move, being careful to stay beyond his peripheral vision and you have thankfully chosen to be defiant. Your college has declared its campus a gun free zone and has made the carrying of a firearm to your class an act, which could lead to your expulsion even though you are a full time police officer. You have chosen to follow your department’s policy and disregard the college’s mandate.

You move quickly to a position of advantage and take careful aim with your off-duty Glock. You have been trained in “Responding to an Active Shooter.” You have prepared by training with your off duty weapon. You do not identify yourself. You do not ask him to drop the gun. You take careful aim and fire once. Your bullet enters the suspect’s left ear, expands and severs the brain stem, lodging against the skull on the opposite side of the entrance wound. The killer crumples instantly lifeless before he hits the floor.

There are casualties, but because you know how to save lives as well as end them, you immediately apply pressure to the wounds of the injured and direct aid calmly to your location with your cell phone. No one dies except the shooter, who has now, thanks to you, discovered whether or not there is a hell for people who shoot kill innocents. He has had his question answered. The answer is yes. He has also learned there are no virgins for the murderers of innocents, no exercise hour, no television, no conjugal visits, no cafeteria and no parole.

Obstacles

There are some truths to the fictional account you have just read. Police Officers are more prepared than ever to respond to the ever growing phenomenon of the Active Shooter. Training is available and is being attended by officers all over the country. Legislators have made it easier than ever for highly trained officers, who are on duty and off duty as well as retired to carry concealed weapons and possibly be in a position to do something in the event of an active shooter.

Colleges, which have become targets, have mandated with their own rules and regulations the disarming of those, who could and would protect them if this death and destruction were visited upon them. Some colleges all over the nation have their police and security patrolling “unarmed.” The college administrations write rules and regulations that if followed to the letter would disarm police officers attending classes at their facility.

Trainers are experiencing cases where college police attempt to attend active shooter classes and SWAT classes, but are blocked by deans who over-see college police and security. The college administrators feel that these classes will create an overbearing and heavy handed police force on campus. They do this in the wake of the deaths on campuses at Blacksburg, DeKalb and even the University of Montreal in Canada.

Mental health professionals are routinely failing to properly diagnose the degree of danger in many persons who are mentally ill. Many officers have stories of subjects they put mental holds on who were immediately released by mental health professionals and shortly thereafter went out and killed. The irony is in many of these cases, after the killing, when the subject is about to be tried for their crimes, the same mental health professionals, now enlightened, will diagnose the same subject as too mentally ill to stand trial.

In spite of these obstacles law enforcement continues to prepare for the active shooter. Agencies are now aware that they do not have to wait until the crying and the dying starts to intervene effectively in these cases of the active shooter.  Rolling out the yellow crime scene tape is not the only option for law enforcement.

Five Phases of the Active Shooter

A simple view of the active shooter was developed and is being trained by Lt. Dan Marcou retired from the La Crosse, Wisconsin Police Department. He developed the program while working for the La Crosse Police Department and was able to apply the philosophy with real world success. One of the successes earned Officer Bob Michalski and Lt. Marcou the Associate of SWAT Personnel Officers of the Year in 2004 for their response to an active shooter, who was killing innocents with an Uzi in a hotel in Oak Creek Wisconsin.

In the discussion of the active shooter “he” will be utilized because generally these are males, but the killing of innocents is not a male-only club any more. The five phases of the active shooter are:

The Fantasy Stage

During the fantasy stage the shooter pictures himself doing the shooting. He fantasizes about the headlines he will receive. The shooter might draw pictures of the event and make web site postings. He has been known to write stories about the shootings and turn them into schools for a grade. Often he predicts, promises and warns people about the impending event. If law enforcement is notified in advance and takes actions there is a strong possibility tragedy will be averted with zero casualties.

Planning Stage

In this stage the subject is deciding on the who, what, when, where and how of his joyful killing spree. He most often will put his plans down in writing.  He will decide the time and location of the event and what weapons they will need to carry out the carnage. He will design his response to inflict as much death and suffering as possible. He may prepare a shopping list of items needed to carry out the plan.

The shooter will determine how to travel to the location and how to conceal his weapons. He will decide on whether to commit the crime alone, or to confide in and utilize an accomplice. The internet affords the opportunity for dangerously unstable persons to communicate.

If a police officer is notified by a family member, friend, teacher, school liaison or anyone else who discovers the plans, then the officer will have an opportunity to intervene before the event - with once again zero casualties.

Preparation Stage

During this stage the suspect will buy, beg, borrow and steal items that he needs for the event. He might buy guns and ammo. He might purchase materials for explosives, which when observed separately look innocuous, but when combined is deadly. He often steals what he cannot buy, often stealing from family members.

He will assemble his improvised explosive devices and train with his weapons. He may detonate some explosives to insure that they will work.

The active shooter will visit the sites he will attack and do drawings and schematics of the areas. He will conduct reconnaissance as if his is preparing for a military operation.

The potential shooter might be arrested by police after they receive a call from a friend, family member, or suspicious citizen. The potential shooter might be apprehended by an alert officer, after a traffic stop or during an in-progress theft or burglary. If done with caution and alertness the suspect can be taken into custody with zero casualties.

Approach Stage

The closer to the event, the more dangerous it will be, when officers take action. When the subject is approaching the target he will be very dangerous, because he has his eyes on the prize. He has made his plans, armed himself and he has made his decision to kill. He may be walking, riding, or driving to the target carrying his implements of death.

Officers might be prompted to contact the subject because of the sheer alertness of an officer or as a result of a traffic stop by an officer practicing interdiction. A citizen might make a call of a suspicious person.

The officer or officers making contact, during the approach stage are in danger, but as long as the officer(s) keep an open mind on every stop they can be kept safe by their superior tactics, skills, and will to survive. There is a fine line between an officer having his/her name etched into an award or his/her name etched into a wall. This contact, handled in a tactically sound manner can save many lives, prevent carnage, and end with zero casualties.

Implementation Stage

When the active shooter opens fire immediate action needs to be taken. The ingredient that ties all of these incidents together is the active shooter will continue to shoot until he run out of victims or ammunition, or his is stopped by his own hand or an effective and efficient act of courage.

The quicker the actions of an honorable gunfighter in the guise of an on-duty officer, off-duty officer, armed retired officer, or armed security guard the fewer funerals there will be. People ask, “How many gunfighters should you have before you advance?” The answer to this question could be answered by potential victims who are about to succumb to the mad man’s desire to achieve “Top score.”  The potential victims would say, “six is better than five, five is better than four, four is better than three, three is better than two, two is better than one and one honorable gunfighter is better than none.”

There is an old cavalry adage that goes, “when the battle begins and you do not know what to do, Ride to the sound of the guns.”

Police officers have the following advantage:

  • They are highly trained, honorable gun fighters.
  • The active shooter will be focused on his dastardly deed.
  • The active shooter will be creating a scene that will be loud and chaotic -- the perfect diversion.
  • The initial responder(s) can use the chaos to identify the location of the shooter.
  • The initial responder(s) can use the chaos to move quietly to a position of advantage.
  • Terrified victims will be able to direct officers to the location of the shooter.
  • If the shooter is located in the act of shooting, officers do not have to verbalize they can take the shot and make the shot.
  • If the shooter is contained by the actions of the officers in a non-violent pose, officers may initiate a classic SWAT response.

On Duty Tactics

Officers responding to a call of an active shooter must realize they have been thrust into a position that calls for decisive action and what they decide to do can save lives and minimize casualties.

Training can help prepare the first responding officers for the moment they arrive at the scene of such an incident. This is a dire situation and that may result in casualties.  A key decision has to be made instantaneously on whether to contain and await other units or move to contact, because defenseless citizens that officers are sworn to protect are dying with each shot.

When the first responding officers arrive they should remember to use long guns for long halls. Officers should choose to put superior fire power into their hands. Breathe and try to control the heart rate on the approach as you use your radio on the move, directing additional units en route and notifying others of the actions that are being taken.

Do not throw lives away, breathe, think, advance, using the chaos as a diversion. Officers may have to pass wounded, conduct quick interviews on the move and encourage direct fleeing individuals to continue their flight, while advancing on the shooter.

Gather as much information as possible and then attempt to move to a position of advantage that affords a field of vision, clear shot and cover if at all possible. Attempt to do this without alerting the suspect.

Quickly assess the actions of the suspect and if he is in the act of shooting, and endangering innocents of death and or great bodily harm, need not advise warn or request. Take and make the shot. The officer should then break up his/her tunnel vision and look for additional shooters. The officer should communicate his/her location and actions and reload in the lull.  This should be done while covering the downed suspect. Secure the suspect and assess his condition.

Off Duty Tactics

As you read this you either carry off duty or you do not. If you carry off duty ask yourself these questions:

  • Do I carry a weapon and holster I have trained with?
  • Do I have a way to identify myself as a police officer?
  • Do I have a way to secure a suspect I have arrested off duty?
  • Do I have a way to communicate off duty?
  • Do I have reload capability?
  • Have I participated in hands on “Active Shooter Response” training?
  • Have I read and digested my agency’s off duty policy and deadly force policy?

If you answered no to any of these questions you need to take some kind of action to answer yes.

If you do not carry off-duty, take the time to ask the following:

  • Should I carry off duty in a post 9-11, post Columbine world?
  • If someone was shooting in my child’s school would I take action armed or not?
  • Do I possess empty hand deadly force options for the worst case scenario?
  • If I were about to be shot by an active shooter, would I refuse to go quietly into the night?

The Law

Due to changes in the federal law it is much easier for officers to carry concealed weapons off duty. Retired officers can also carry off duty, when they have received proper training and carry identification with departmental authorization. Officers should check their local policies and procedures, before arming themselves. Many agencies do not allow officers, who are retired to carry concealed weapons out of concerns for liability. Administrators should ask themselves if this is prudent in today’s world.

Conclusion 

Clearly this nation has not seen the last mindless homicidal act. It is a very real possibility that any police officer, on duty or off, regardless of their department size,  rank, shift, or assignment might be faced with a suspect laying down a withering fire at innocent men women and children. These heartless killers might be a threat to you, your family, or the people you are sworn to protect.

The location of your date with destiny might be a mall, a church, a court room, a school, a hotel, or even a police station. Prepare!

line-small.gif (227 bytes)

By Andrew Hawkes

Officers often use the term “hidden compartments” when referring to large loads of narcotics hidden inside of vehicles.  The term is rather generic and I like to break the term down into more specifics.  Hidden compartments can encompass both Hidden NATURAL compartments, meaning areas of the vehicle that are hidden from the naked eye but are a natural part of the manufactured vehicle.  The second type of hidden compartment would of course be the Hidden FALSE compartment, the compartment that is specifically built into the vehicle to hide contraband. 

Both Natural and False compartments can be utilized by the drug trafficker effectively, and often there is no difference as to which one is more successful.  As a highly trained drug interdiction officer, you can successfully locate both types of compartments.

The drug hauler doesn’t think like an interdiction officer and that is what gets him/her caught.  He is thinking, “If I can build this super secret compartment that no one can find I will get away with hauling this 50 kilos of coke”.  He thinks about how well the compartment is.  On the other hand, a highly skilled interdiction officer doesn’t worry about where the dope is hidden.  He knows that if he picks up on the right indicators, if his interview leads to stories that don’t make sense, then he knows he is going to find the load of dope no matter where in the car it is.

With that theory in mind let’s take a look at 10 popular areas of concealment for drug trafficking, keeping in mind that this is not an all inclusive list, but only 10 out of hundreds of concealment methods.

  1. Wheels/Tires:  This can be a natural area of a vehicle that can be used to build a false compartment in where the drug trafficker feels that even an experienced interdiction officer will overlook.  Spare tires were popular for a long time until officers began to figure out that they were being used to transport dope.  So the traffickers switched to building and welding steel compartments to the inside of the wheels the vehicle was actually rolling on.  Be sure to check for odors by letting the air out, by checking the weight of the wheel tire combination, and by utilizing a narcotic canine when necessary.
     

  2. Bumpers:  False compartments can be built on the inside of both front bumpers and rear bumpers of passenger cars.  Make sure in your search techniques that you are able to compensate for any space or lack of space in bumpers.  Utilizing fiber optic scopes, density meters as well as canine can assist in this area.  Be sure to check the nuts and bolts that attach the bumpers to the car.  Do they have recent scar marks on them?
     

  3. Behind/Under the Backseat:  Extremely popular concealment location.  I like to refer to this area as the “lazy trafficker’s hidden compartment”.  For some reason they don’t think an experienced interdiction officer will bother to look under and behind the backseat.  WRONG.  Be sure to compensate for any space or lack thereof behind the backseat, between the seat and the trunk.  This is not only a popular natural hiding place, but a popular location to build a false compartment as well.
     

  4. Doors: Traffickers like to hide bundles of dope in the naturally hollow doors in the vehicle.  Simply by popping off the inside plastic cover they can access this area and simply put the covers back in place.  Check these areas by canine, and interdiction equipment.  An old school method is by tapping on the doors, they should sound hollow not solid.  Officer’s can also check for scarred bolts and nuts and check to see if the windows roll down all the way.  If they do not, this is a tell-tale sign of packages of dope hindering the windows from rolling down on the inside of the door. 
     

  5. Rocker panels and Fenders:  This natural area of the vehicle has been being used for years by Mexican smugglers.  You can check for bond on the front fenders in the engine compartment, any trip wires or fresh paint as well.  Rocker panels are areas of the vehicle frame that can be accessed through the wheel wells and can be hidden well.  Canine is best used on rocker panels.  Also check for bondo on the inside of the wheel well and /or fresh paint and added dirt/mud.
     

  6. Gas Tanks:  Another popular NATURAL hidden compartment.  The old method of the smuggler was to simply unbolt the gas tank from the vehicle, load it up with dope and re-attach it.  However, skilled interdiction officer’s picked up on this by noticing the tanks have been recently removed from the vehicle.  So then they started cutting through the frame, often underneath the backseat and cutting holes into the gas tank where they dropped their packages of dope inside then closed it up.  Look for fresh tampering underneath the backseat or trunk area, depending on the location of the tank. 
     

  7. Floors:  Can be a source of FALSE or NATURAL concealment.  An identical sheet metal floor can be constructed on top of the existing floor to resemble the factory floor.  Look for uncompensated space, maybe as small as one inch in height that would allow for kilos and kilos of dope to be lined beneath it.  I have also seen very thin vacuumed sealed bags of dope laid underneath the carpet of the vehicle.
     

  8. Dashboard:  Look for dope simply stuffed behind them or for false compartments that are often accessed by special trip wires, etc…Do Not overlook the air conditioner components as well.
     

  9. Undercarriage:  Often times the trafficker will attempt to weld steel boxes or compartments on the undercarriage of the vehicle.  These can usually be located by a thorough inspection of the undercarriage by crawling up under the vehicle or using a telescoping mirror.
     

  10. Pickup Trucks:  Do not overlook some of the great areas, natural and false being utilized by traffickers.  False beds can be welded just a few inches above and on top of the Original bed.  Look to see if the bed is flush with the tailgate when the tailgate is dropped and opened.  Also be aware of the same tactic but built underneath the original bed instead of above it, which will sometimes require the removal of the rear bumper to see the discrepancy.  False front walls of pickup beds can be made using the same techniques then covered up by a mounted toolbox.  Removal of the tool box may be required to locate it, either by probable cause or consent or canine sniff.  The natural hollow walls of a pickup truck can hold vast amounts of dope, often utilized by simply removing the taillights and packing it in.  Check these areas by removing the taillights, or by checking for solid sounds where it should be hollow or by interdiction equipment.

These are just a few of many areas of concealment for drug traffickers, but by becoming familiar with them and how to located them, you have just given yourself 10 areas of the vehicle to make sure that you clear before releasing the suspected drug trafficker. 

As always, stay safe and continue to fight the good fight.

Andrew Hawkes
www.druginterdictiointraining.com
www.highwaydruginterdiction.com

Disclaimer:  All training material and articles by Andrew Hawkes are sold and/or made available to law enforcement officers only through secure websites.  Any of his publications that are made public via internet without the written permission of Andrew Hawkes are unauthorized.

line-small.gif (227 bytes)

< < jump to the policetraining.net home page